[oshug] [Open Manufacturing] Fwd: Open hardware anemometer

John Griessen john at industromatic.com
Sat Jun 25 17:18:32 UTC 2011

> From: *christopher west*

I've decided to design
> my own  PCB from scratch. I'm a electronic engineer by trade so this
> shouldn't cause to many headaches but if this is too difficult I will
> consider using an Arduino.

Have you considered using pcb and gschem for the electronics?  There's
a supportive list and good ways to get library schematic symbols and pcb footprints
besides making your own.

if you have any pointers I would
> be very great full.
> Regards,
> Chris West

great full. --> grateful.

Have you done much market research on the commercial competition?  There are plenty of
weather stations proven and working, so all you can hope for is a cost reduction,
and it might be tough to beat standard prices as they've been evolving for so long.
But, if you think prices are easy to beat, that's a good reason for open hardware.

The functions of a weather station barely make a microcontroller breathe hard,
so I immediately think, "What else could you add in the microcontroller part
to make a weather station better?", and it strikes me you should use a higher level
language than C for the code, and so users can adapt their stations -- use them
as development platforms.  Then you have a wider market -- scientists start
to be interested, tinkerers of course, and developers of instrumentation setups.
Otherwise your market is just other EE/CS types, (if they like C).

What I like is python-on-a-chip, running on micros like
STM32 or MC13224v.  See  http://www.redwirellc.com/store/node/1

The STM32 stamp board can run elua, a version of lua:


That's another high level language that some say is good for rapid development. I've not tried it yet,
but it looks like time.

John Griessen

More information about the oshug mailing list