[oshug] "The audio genius who vanished"

Gareth Coleman gareth at l0l.org.uk
Sat Jan 16 17:45:51 UTC 2016


Great articles and discussion, thanks!

I was amazed to read Stallman say:

"Copyright doesn't cover physical circuits, so when people build instances
of the circuit, the design's license will have no legal effect on what they
do with the devices they have built."

So provided someone is prepared to transcribe your device into their own
EDA files, they can just copy it, modify it, commercialise it - without
restrictions (like NC or ND) that you might want to apply? Can this be
correct?!

Gareth

On 15 January 2016 at 17:00, Jason Flynn G7OCD <flynnjs at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I'm going to stick my neck out here as someone who regularly makes NC and
> ND contribution to the community. It's unhelpful and unpleasant having
> people class your work as second class because of some other peoples'
> arbitrary redefinition of the word open. There are a lot of greedy and
> selfish people out there and my efforts to put my works in the public
> domain are for then general good and not to fuel such people who offer
> nothing to society in return.
> It doesn't mean that my efforts can never be moved forward or turned to
> profit but it does allow me to vet the intentions of those that I let do so.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oshug mailing list
> oshug at oshug.org
> http://oshug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oshug
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oshug.org/pipermail/oshug/attachments/20160116/e3f3c618/attachment.htm>


More information about the oshug mailing list