[oshug] OSHWA certification mark: call for ideas
blueback09 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 20 15:17:58 UTC 2016
I think I was the only random community member to join OSHWA's last hangout
on the subject. Their explanation made a lot more sense "in person". Here's
my updated take on it.
On Mar 20, 2016 05:07, "Andrew Back" <arback at computer.org> wrote:
> On 18 March 2016 at 11:09, Saar Drimer <saar at boldport.com> wrote:
> > Taking care of the important stuff first! </sarcasm>
> > Here's what I wrote when the first whiff of that 'certification' folly
> > came about back in September...
> > http://www.boldport.com/blog/2015/9/22/the-license-is-the-license
> Indeed. While undoubtedly well intentioned, it is more than a little
> problematic. Not least in the requirement that those using the mark,
> submit to being subject to severe financial penalties should they fall
> foul of the associated conditions. I cannot imagine this ever getting
> past legal counsel at a large organisation.
> oshug mailing list
> oshug at oshug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the oshug